Let’s say a compliance platform costs $12,000 annually. Does that sound expensive?
The answer will depend on the product it replaces.
If automating the collection of evidence across a complex technology-driven environment will eliminate hundreds of hours of repetitive work it could be an investment worth it. If a startup with seven employees could manually gather similar evidence in just two hours per month, the calculation is quite different.
It’s a great method to begin the search for Vanta. Don’t begin by asking what platform comes with the most features. Ask your company how these features can help you save time and money.
Automated Manufacturing has a Break-Even Level
It’s not intrinsically either good or bad. The value of compliance automation alters as the business grows. Imagine a company that is growing with multiple cloud environments as well as various applications. Manually collecting evidence could be a significant operational burden. Integrations that automately monitor systems and gather evidence could be able to justify the cost.
Imagine a startup of 10 people getting ready to go through its initial SOC 2. audit. It could have a smaller infrastructure, and the evidence collection could be handled without a lot of automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a high-end platform are amazing, however they are only useful when a company requires them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
The search for Vanta and Drata quickly turns into a feature-by practice. Both platforms are based on automation and integration, so organizations looking for this method can benefit from comparing the frameworks supported along with their integrations and services as well as individual quotations and contracts.
Another decision needs to be made prior to that. Do you want to use a Compliance platform that integrates? Certain businesses want constant monitoring as well as automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to supply their own evidence, particularly when workload is modest.
Vanta Competitors do not follow the exact same guidelines.
A number of well-known Vanta rivals compete in a category that has a similar focus on automation. There are lighter platforms which focus on organization and large system connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this group. Created by compliance experts and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a single workstation, gives editable policies and evidence guidelines, and permits auditors to look over evidence with access to only read-only.
It does not, in fact, connect to operational systems, or install infrastructure agents. Customers can upload evidence that they prefer.
Consideration should be given to the system’s access.
It is clear that cutting off integrations will have a disadvantage. Someone has to gather evidence by hand.
The compliance application does not require any integration and can be used with no connection to the operational environment.
The design and architecture of one is not superior to each other. The relevant question is which option is most appropriate for your company.
CertAssist is targeted at companies with five to 200 employees and offers pricing information instead of having an actual sales call. The advertised price of launch for CertAssist is $225 monthly instead of an average of $375.
Let Complexity earn its place
The requirements for a start-up with a staff of 10 are not necessarily identical to those of an organization with 100 or 500 employees.
Although compliance is easy A lightweight platform could be a good idea. As the amount of systems, employees as well as frameworks and evidence requirements increase, the economy could eventually favor more automation. It’s better to let the complexity of compliance technology earn its place.
Do not purchase fifty different integrations just because they look impressive on the chart of comparison. You should pay for them only if you realize that the cost of the task they replace manually is greater.