Let’s suppose that a compliance system is worth $12,000 per year. Does it cost a lot?
What it replaces will decide the answer.
Automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology system eliminates hundreds of hours of repetitive work, then $12,000 is a well-spent amount of money. If a company of seven could gather the same data manually, in a couple of hours every month, the total appears to be quite different.
It’s an effective method to begin your search for Vanta. Identifying the platform with the greatest features is not the first step. Determine how many hours and time these features could save your business.
Automation Has an Economic Break-Even Factor
Automating compliance isn’t necessarily beneficial or harmful. The importance of automation for compliance changes as the company grows. Imagine a tech company that is growing, with numerous cloud environments, numerous applications, and regular changes in access. Gathering evidence manually can be a major operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence could quickly justify their cost.
Imagine a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2. Think about a startup that has 10 employees preparing for its first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a sophisticated platform are impressive, but they can only be of value for organizations that require them.
Compare Architecture, Not Just Brands
Searching for Vanta or Drata could quickly turn into a feature-by-feature exercise. Both are well-established systems for compliance built around automation and integrations. As such, they can be compared in terms of supported frameworks and integrations, services, contracts, and individual quotes could prove useful to companies who are looking for a similar approach.
You’ll have to decide on another thing first. Is your company interested in an integration-driven platform for compliance? Certain companies would like constant monitoring as well as automated evidence collection. Other businesses would prefer to produce their own evidence, especially in cases of low workload.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Always Follow the same model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete within an identical category that is focused on automation. On the market, there are also platforms with a lighter design which are focused more on the organization of systems rather instead of connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter category. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It organizes framework controls into a single workspace that gives editable guidance on policies and evidence. Auditors are able to review the evidence submitted through a read-only interface.
It is deliberately not connected to operational systems or install infrastructure agents. Customers can upload evidence that they choose.
System Access is a consideration in the Decision
It is obvious that removing integrations is a disadvantage. Someone has to gather evidence manually.
This removes the requirement to integrate and the implementation of compliance is not dependent upon an interface to the operational environment.
The architectures of either are not superior to the other. It is essential to inquire which choices are best for your company.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams with five to 200 employees and provides pricing information instead of having an in-person sales meeting. Its official launch price is $225 per month compared with a regular price of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity Find Its Place
Today’s needs for a startup with 10 employees aren’t necessarily similar to the needs of the company that has 100 or 500 workers.
Although compliance is easy an easy platform can make sense. As the amount of systems, employees as well as frameworks and evidence requirements increases, economics may eventually favor greater automation. Let complexity take its place when purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t buy fifty integrations simply because they look attractive on a comparison chart. Spend money on them if manually performing the task they replace is the more costly option.